Weakness At Heart Of Gov't Birthright Citizenship Challenge
· WOWERI
The government's arguments against birthright citizenship may be easier to administer, but weaker in terms of text and history. Attorney Tara Kennedy comments on recent oral arguments.
Introduction
The government recently presented oral arguments against birthright citizenship in the case of Trump v. Barbara. Attorney Tara Kennedy believes that these arguments are based on modern immigration classifications that may be used as markers for a constitutional boundary not expressed in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Analysis of Arguments
The government's arguments may seem easier to administer, but they are weaker in terms of text and history. Attorney Tara Kennedy highlights that using modern immigration classifications as markers for a constitutional boundary may lead to unintended consequences.
Conclusion
The case of Trump v. Barbara is significant for the future of birthright citizenship in the US. Attorney Tara Kennedy recommends closely following the development of this case and its potential implications for immigration law.
What to do next
- Application for Naturalization — Order
Not sure it fits? Consultation $150
Source: law360.com