7th Circ. Scolds Ex-Judge For Citing Fake Cases
· WOWERI
A 7th Circuit panel scolded an attorney and former chief federal immigration judge for submitting a brief citing two nonexistent cases and a false quotation. The court noted that such errors can be tell-tale signs of AI hallucinations.
Introduction
A 7th Circuit panel scolded an attorney and former chief federal immigration judge for submitting a brief citing two nonexistent cases and a false quotation. The court noted that such errors can be tell-tale signs of AI hallucinations.
Error in Court Brief
The former immigration judge presented a court brief that cited two nonexistent cases and used a false quotation. The court discovered these errors and expressed dissatisfaction with the former judge's actions.
Consequences of Errors
The court noted that citing nonexistent cases and using false quotations can be indicative of AI use. However, the former immigration judge denied using AI, and the court found this statement plausible.
Conclusion
The 7th Circuit panel scolded the former federal immigration judge for citing nonexistent cases and a false quotation in a court brief. The court emphasized the importance of accuracy and truthfulness in court briefs and warned against using AI to create fictional cases and quotations.
What to do next
- Appeal to Board of Immigration Appeals — Order
- Cancellation of Removal for Lawful Permanent Residents — Order
Not sure it fits? Consultation $150
Source: law360.com